Guido Terreni, Marsilius of Padua, and William of Ockham on Institutional Infallibility
In the third part of his Dialogus, William of Ockham briefly dealt with Marsilius of Padua’s theory of conciliar infallibility. By contrast, none of the contemporary papalist responses to the Defensor pacis discussed Marsilius’ antipapal conciliar programme. This paper attempts to shed light on the...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Peeters
2010
|
| In: |
Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
Year: 2010, Volume: 77, Issue: 2, Pages: 299-311 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Electronic
|
| Summary: | In the third part of his Dialogus, William of Ockham briefly dealt with Marsilius of Padua’s theory of conciliar infallibility. By contrast, none of the contemporary papalist responses to the Defensor pacis discussed Marsilius’ antipapal conciliar programme. This paper attempts to shed light on the papalists’ silence by relating the Ockham–Marsilius debate to Guido Terreni’s theory of infallibility. On this basis, the text argues that the Franciscan theologian was far more detached from the mainstream of traditional late medieval ecclesiology than either Marsilius or his papalist opponents.\n4207 \n4207 |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1783-1717 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Recherches de théologie et philosophie médiévales
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/RTPM.77.2.2062480 |