Can a Pacifist Have a Conversation with Augustine? A Response to Alain Epp Weaver
Christians have historically differed as to whether the wrongness of an act is to be located in the objective character of the act or in the intention of the agent. By blurring this distinction, Alain Epp Weaver fails to see the real principle of consistency that unites Augustine's analyses of...
Κύριος συγγραφέας: | |
---|---|
Τύπος μέσου: | Ηλεκτρονική πηγή Άρθρο |
Γλώσσα: | Αγγλικά |
Έλεγχος διαθεσιμότητας: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Έκδοση: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2001
|
Στο/Στη: |
Journal of religious ethics
Έτος: 2001, Τόμος: 29, Τεύχος: 1, Σελίδες: 87-93 |
Άλλες λέξεις-κλειδιά: | B
objective evil
B Killing B Augustine B Πρόθεση B lies |
Διαθέσιμο Online: |
Volltext (JSTOR) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Παράλληλη έκδοση: | Μη ηλεκτρονικά
|
Σύνοψη: | Christians have historically differed as to whether the wrongness of an act is to be located in the objective character of the act or in the intention of the agent. By blurring this distinction, Alain Epp Weaver fails to see the real principle of consistency that unites Augustine's analyses of warfare and lying. Likewise, by not appreciating the fact that Augustine analyzes the wrongness of the act in terms of intention whereas Yoder analyzes its wrongness in terms of its objective character, Weaver proposes a conversation between two figures who lack the framework of shared assumptions that makes engagement in conversation possible. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-9795 |
Περιλαμβάνει: | Enthalten in: Journal of religious ethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/0384-9694.00069 |