The Paradigm of the Wild, Cultural Diversity, and Chinese Environmentalism: A Response to Holmes Rolston, III
The so-called "Paradigm of the Wild" means either environmental ethics or environmental aesthetics has gone wild. According to Holmes Rolston, III, "philosophy has gone wild." Chinese traditional environmentalism takes another anthropocosmic way, and it has a global applicability...
| Subtitles: | "Nature, Wilderness, and Civilization: Perspectives from Chinese Scholars" |
|---|---|
| Main Author: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2020
|
| In: |
Environmental ethics
Year: 2020, Volume: 42, Issue: 3, Pages: 223-235 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | The so-called "Paradigm of the Wild" means either environmental ethics or environmental aesthetics has gone wild. According to Holmes Rolston, III, "philosophy has gone wild." Chinese traditional environmentalism takes another anthropocosmic way, and it has a global applicability in cultural diversity. The dichotomy of "nature-culture" is already out of date, and humans have to face the new relation of humanized-nature today. From the perspective of "ethics and aesthetics" in Chinese Confucianism, a different passageway between environmental ethics and environmental aesthetics can be shaped. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2153-7895 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Environmental ethics
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.5840/enviroethics202042322 |