The cosmic lottery

One version of the argument for design relies on the assumption that the apparent fine-tuning of the universe for the existence of life requires an explanation. I argue that the assumption is false. Philosophers who argue for the assumption usually appeal to analogies, such as the one in which a per...

ver descrição completa

Na minha lista:  
Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor principal: Wong, Wai-hung (Author)
Tipo de documento: Recurso Electrónico Artigo
Idioma:Inglês
Verificar disponibilidade: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Carregar...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Publicado em: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2009
Em: International journal for philosophy of religion
Ano: 2009, Volume: 66, Número: 3, Páginas: 155
Outras palavras-chave:B Design
B van Inwagen
B Cosmic
B Life-permitting
B Probability
B Universe
B Analogy
B God
B Fine-tuning
Acesso em linha: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Parallel Edition:Recurso Electrónico
Descrição
Resumo:One version of the argument for design relies on the assumption that the apparent fine-tuning of the universe for the existence of life requires an explanation. I argue that the assumption is false. Philosophers who argue for the assumption usually appeal to analogies, such as the one in which a person was to draw a particular straw among a very large number of straws in order not to be killed. Philosophers on the other side appeal to analogies like the case of winning a lottery. I analyze the two analogies and explain why the lottery analogy is the right one to use. In the light of such an analysis, we can see that although the cosmic feature of being life-permitting is rare, it does not allow life-permitting possible universes to stand out because there are other rare cosmic features that other possible universes have.
ISSN:1572-8684
Obras secundárias:Enthalten in: International journal for philosophy of religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s11153-009-9203-3