Methodological Atheism Considered
Thirty years after the publication of Dominique Janicaud’s criticism of what he termed the “theological turn” of phenomenology in France, what is the state of the debate? This paper addresses that question, by examining the phenomenology of revelation in Marion, Lacoste, and others, in turn replying...
| Главный автор: | |
|---|---|
| Формат: | Электронный ресурс Статья |
| Язык: | Английский |
| Проверить наличие: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Загрузка...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Опубликовано: |
2022
|
| В: |
Journal for continental philosophy of religion
Год: 2022, Том: 4, Выпуск: 2, Страницы: 133-165 |
| Другие ключевые слова: | B
Husserl
B Janicaud B Heidegger B Revelation B Lacoste B Marion |
| Online-ссылка: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Итог: | Thirty years after the publication of Dominique Janicaud’s criticism of what he termed the “theological turn” of phenomenology in France, what is the state of the debate? This paper addresses that question, by examining the phenomenology of revelation in Marion, Lacoste, and others, in turn replying to various arguments that have been advanced against the theological turn and on behalf of methodological atheism. Not only is revelation a viable topic of phenomenological analysis, the attempts to formulate a methodologically atheist phenomenology fail. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2588-9613 |
| Второстепенные работы: | Enthalten in: Journal for continental philosophy of religion
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/25889613-bja10033 |