Resolving two tensions in (Neo-)Aristotelian approaches to self-control

A neo-Aristotelian approach to self-control has dominated both philosophy and the sciences of the mind. This approach endorses three key theses: (1) that self-control is a form of self-regulation aimed at desires that conflict with one’s evaluative judgments, (2) that high trait self-control is cont...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Haug, Matthew C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer Science + Business Media B. V 2022
In: Ethical theory and moral practice
Year: 2022, Volume: 25, Issue: 4, Pages: 685-700
Further subjects:B Temperance
B Continence
B Self-control
B motivational conflict
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1819833887
003 DE-627
005 20221024165805.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 221024s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1007/s10677-022-10289-6  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1819833887 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1819833887 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1041914857  |0 (DE-627)767941268  |0 (DE-576)393584887  |4 aut  |a Haug, Matthew C. 
109 |a Haug, Matthew C. 
245 1 0 |a Resolving two tensions in (Neo-)Aristotelian approaches to self-control 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a A neo-Aristotelian approach to self-control has dominated both philosophy and the sciences of the mind. This approach endorses three key theses: (1) that self-control is a form of self-regulation aimed at desires that conflict with one’s evaluative judgments, (2) that high trait self-control is continence, which is distinguished from temperance by (a significant amount of) motivational conflict (which the continent person is good at resisting), and (3) that self-control is broad, in that such resistance can be not only direct (inhibiting or overriding conflicting desires) but also indirect (e.g., preventing conflicting desires from arising). There is an obvious tension between (1) and (3). I argue that the equally obvious resolution of this tension—allowing that self-control does not require occurrent conflicting desires but can instead be aimed at foreseeable conflicting desires—reveals a surprisingly unnoticed tension between (2) and (3). To resolve this tension, we are forced to either deny that high trait self-control is continence or deny that self-control is broad. If self-control is narrow, recent empirical evidence suggests that it may not be a good candidate for a human excellence concerning self-regulation. Thus, if we want to make room for such an excellence, we may need to deny that high trait self-control is continence. However we resolve these tensions, the Aristotelian status quo regarding self-control cannot stand. 
650 4 |a Self-control 
650 4 |a Continence 
650 4 |a motivational conflict 
650 4 |a Temperance 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Ethical theory and moral practice  |d Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer Science + Business Media B.V, 1998  |g 25(2022), 4, Seite 685-700  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320527093  |w (DE-600)2015306-5  |w (DE-576)104558555  |x 1572-8447  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:25  |g year:2022  |g number:4  |g pages:685-700 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-022-10289-6  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4201407829 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1819833887 
LOK |0 005 20221024165231 
LOK |0 008 221024||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw