Jacques Fournier and the Poverty Controversy: New Evidence from a Neglected Gospel Commentary

The Franciscan doctrine of absolute poverty became one of the most controversial matters under discussion in the 1320s. Even after John XXII's poverty decrees, it did not cease attracting the attention of prominent theorists. This article examines the so-far neglected contribution by the key th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bueno, Irene (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2022
In: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 2022, Volume: 73, Issue: 4, Pages: 737-764
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B John XXII Pope 1244-1334 / Benedikt, XII., Pope 1285-1342 / Bible. Matthäusevangelium 10,9-10 / Franciscans / Poverty Controversy / Church / Poverty / Possessions
B Benedikt, XII., Pope 1285-1342, Postilla super Matthaeum
IxTheo Classification:HC New Testament
KAF Church history 1300-1500; late Middle Ages
KCA Monasticism; religious orders
KCB Papacy
NCC Social ethics
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:The Franciscan doctrine of absolute poverty became one of the most controversial matters under discussion in the 1320s. Even after John XXII's poverty decrees, it did not cease attracting the attention of prominent theorists. This article examines the so-far neglected contribution by the key theologian of the Avignon court and future pope, Jacques Fournier (c.1285-1342). His monumental Matthew commentary contains a lengthy discussion of evangelical poverty. Comparing this text with various counsels drafted for the pope, this article brings to light Fournier's stance on poverty, placing it within the debates held at Avignon during the conflict between John XXII and Ludwig the Bavarian.
ISSN:1469-7637
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0022046922000434