Two Stigmatas in Ron Hansen's Mariette in Ecstasy
Criticism on Ron Hansen's Mariette in Ecstasy has, with little hesitation and only one exception, readily accepted the veracity of Mariette's stigmata. Hansen, however, claims to have written the novel to support both belief and unbelief. Employing psychoanalytic and Foucauldian principles...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
Published: |
2022
|
In: |
Christianity & literature
Year: 2022, Volume: 71, Issue: 3, Pages: 398-420 |
IxTheo Classification: | CD Christianity and Culture KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history NAB Fundamental theology |
Further subjects: | B
Critical Theory
B Mysticism B Hermeneutics B sacramental writing B Stigmata |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | Criticism on Ron Hansen's Mariette in Ecstasy has, with little hesitation and only one exception, readily accepted the veracity of Mariette's stigmata. Hansen, however, claims to have written the novel to support both belief and unbelief. Employing psychoanalytic and Foucauldian principles, this article demonstrates the subtle ways with which Hansen consistently provides alternative naturalistic explanation when depicting the supernatural. It argues that Hansen sows seeds of ambiguity not to produce doubt, but to offer a unique theological hermeneutics: he positions his text, as well as Mariette, as a stigmatic—willingly accepting the wounds of suspicious reading to create a more grace-infused sacramental text. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2056-5666 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Christianity & literature
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1353/chy.2022.0033 |