The Quondam of Rievaulx

This is the story of Edward Kirkby's deposition from the office of abbot of Rievaulx in 1533. It has been briefly told before, but the author of that article was not aware of some important evidence and also burdened his account with misleading preconceptions. Perhaps it is not surprising that...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Elton, G. R. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 1956
In: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Year: 1956, Volume: 7, Issue: 1, Pages: 45-60
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This is the story of Edward Kirkby's deposition from the office of abbot of Rievaulx in 1533. It has been briefly told before, but the author of that article was not aware of some important evidence and also burdened his account with misleading preconceptions. Perhaps it is not surprising that all monastic events in the decade 1530–40 should tend to be linked with greater events in Church and State: the Dissolution is commonly allowed to cast its distorting shadow both fore and aft. When a single London monastery is dissolved, historians suspect a carefully staged dress rehearsal of the larger destruction; similarly they ascribe the fate of abbot Edward Kirkby to his ‘opposing the king's new doctrines’. But this concentration on the outstanding event is most perilous. The monasteries of the day do not seem to have been aware of their coming doom; their history continued to be centred upon the narrower compass’ of their own interests. We shall see that Kirkby's story does indeed reflect some issues of more general importance, but it is not true that he was deposed because he quarrelled with the new state of things or because the king wanted him out. In fact, Henry VIII in person never enters upon the stage and is likely to have remained practically ignorant of Edward Kirkby. Like others of that time, the abbot has been permitted to wear an undeserved, if rather tiny, crown of lesser martyrdom—lesser because, surviving the 1530s, he lacked the full qualifications for a victim of Henry VIII. The facts must rob him of his touch of spurious glory, but his unmasking may help towards a better understanding of that troubled age.
ISSN:1469-7637
Contains:Enthalten in: The journal of ecclesiastical history
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0022046900071505