Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?*
The paper examines the view that individuals have a claim to the jobs for which they are the best qualified. It seeks to show this view to be groundless, and to offer, instead, a luck egalitarian account of justice in hiring. That account consists of three components: monism, non-meritocracy, and no...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2012
|
| In: |
Journal of moral philosophy
Year: 2012, Volume: 9, Issue: 1, Pages: 31-54 |
| Further subjects: | B
Justice
B Meritocracy B Discrimination B hiring B jobs B luck-egalitarianism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1817472607 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220927053002.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220927s2012 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/174552411X592149 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1817472607 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1817472607 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Segall, Shlomi |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Should the Best Qualified Be Appointed?* |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2012 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a The paper examines the view that individuals have a claim to the jobs for which they are the best qualified. It seeks to show this view to be groundless, and to offer, instead, a luck egalitarian account of justice in hiring. That account consists of three components: monism, non-meritocracy, and non-discrimination. To demonstrate the coherence of this view, two particular internal conflicts are addressed. First, luck egalitarian monism (the view that jobs are not special) may end up violating the non-discrimination requirement. Second, non-discrimination, it is often suggested, cannot be defined without reference to qualifications, thus violating the non-meritocracy requirement. The paper seeks to address these, as well as other, potential objections, and show that whereas meritocratic accounts are without basis, luck egalitarianism provides a coherent and attractive account of justice in hiring. | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Meritocracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a luck-egalitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a jobs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hiring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discrimination | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Meritocracy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a luck-egalitarianism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Justice | |
| 650 | 4 | |a jobs | |
| 650 | 4 | |a hiring | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Discrimination | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t Journal of moral philosophy |d Leiden : Brill, 2004 |g 9(2012), 1, Seite 31-54 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)474382281 |w (DE-600)2169771-1 |w (DE-576)273875329 |x 1745-5243 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:2012 |g number:1 |g pages:31-54 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/174552411X592149 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/jmp/9/1/article-p31_4.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 936 | u | w | |d 9 |j 2012 |e 1 |h 31-54 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4192065606 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1817472607 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220927053002 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220927||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-22#0A287C029D35320D9A1D489589BB8A6E410626FB | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||