Moral enhancement, acquired virtue, and theism: A response to Brummett and Crutchfield

Recently, Brummett and Crutchfield advanced two critiques of theists who object to moral enhancement. First, a conceptual critique: theists who oppose moral enhancement commonly do so because virtue is thought to be acquired only via a special kind of process. Enhancement does not involve such proce...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Colgrove, Nicholas (Author) ; McAllister, Derek (Author) ; Rea, Burke (Author)
Contributors: Brummett, Abram (Bibliographic antecedent)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Wiley-Blackwell 2022
In: Bioethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 36, Issue: 8, Pages: 891-898
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
NCA Ethics
NCJ Ethics of science
Further subjects:B Transhumanism
B moral enhancement
B Virtue
B Religion
B Virtue Ethics
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1816969311
003 DE-627
005 20221012103200.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220920s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1111/bioe.13073  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1816969311 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1816969311 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Colgrove, Nicholas  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Moral enhancement, acquired virtue, and theism: A response to Brummett and Crutchfield 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a Recently, Brummett and Crutchfield advanced two critiques of theists who object to moral enhancement. First, a conceptual critique: theists who oppose moral enhancement commonly do so because virtue is thought to be acquired only via a special kind of process. Enhancement does not involve such processes. Hence, enhancement cannot produce virtue. Yet theists also commonly claim that God is perfectly virtuous and not subject to processes. If virtue requires a process and God is perfectly virtuous without a process, however, then theists contradict themselves. Second, a moral critique: theists who reject moral enhancement are selfish, because accepting moral enhancement would (allegedly) reduce widespread suffering. Theists often condemn selfishness, however. By condemning selfishness and (simultaneously) rejecting enhancement, therefore, theists contradict themselves yet again. We argue that both critiques fail. Both substantially misrepresent their target. First, Brummett and Crutchfield confuse metaphysical enhancement (attempts to alter human nature) with moral enhancement (attempts to become better human beings). Authors that Brummett and Crutchfield cite object to the former, not the latter. Second, both conceptual and moral critiques overlook the many resources within theistic traditions that can quickly resolve relevant (alleged) contradictions. The conceptual critique, for example, misrepresents both common views held among theists (regarding God's virtue) and the ways in which virtue may be acquired. Similarly, the moral critique mischaracterizes the relationship commonly posited by theists between enhancement and agency. By attending to what theists actually claim—rather than relying on caricatures—it becomes clear that each of Brummett and Crutchfield's critiques fail. 
650 4 |a Virtue Ethics 
650 4 |a Virtue 
650 4 |a Transhumanism 
650 4 |a Religion 
650 4 |a moral enhancement 
652 |a AB:NCA:NCJ 
700 1 |a McAllister, Derek  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Rea, Burke  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
700 1 |a Brummett, Abram  |e VerfasserIn des Bezugswerks  |4 ant 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Bioethics  |d Oxford [u.a.] : Wiley-Blackwell, 1987  |g 36(2022), 8, Seite 891-898  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)271596708  |w (DE-600)1480658-7  |w (DE-576)078707986  |x 1467-8519  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:36  |g year:2022  |g number:8  |g pages:891-898 
787 0 8 |i Kritik von  |a Brummett, Abram  |t Two internal critiques for theists who oppose moral enhancement on a process virtue basis  |d 2022  |w (DE-627)1800525214 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/COLMEA-11.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.13073  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
856 4 0 |u https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bioe.13073  |x Verlag  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
936 u w |d 36  |j 2022  |e 8  |h 891-898 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4190122866 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1816969311 
LOK |0 005 20221004191951 
LOK |0 008 220920||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-09-19#A5624BD23C659B11664126035A5AB5B0EB3B8CD9 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736582  |a NCJ 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442052465  |a NCA 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion,Religion in literature 
STB 0 0 |a Religion,Religions,Religion 
STC 0 0 |a Religión,Religión,Religión 
STD 0 0 |a Religione,Religione,Religione 
STE 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STF 0 0 |a 宗教,宗教 
STG 0 0 |a Religião,Religião 
STH 0 0 |a Религия (мотив),Религия 
STI 0 0 |a Θρησκεία (μοτίβο),Θρησκεία 
SUB |a REL 
SYE 0 0 |a Religion,Mystik,Mythologie