Keine Priesterschrift in Ex 1-15?
Following in the steps of Rendtorff and Blum, recent research on the Pentateuch has concentrated on the nature of P – whether it is to be seen as source, redaction or composition. The author investigates the characteristics and problems of the 'P'-texts, mainly in Ex 1–7, and proposes an a...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | German |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Echter
1995
|
In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 1995, Volume: 117, Issue: 2, Pages: 203-211 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Bible. Exodus 1-15
/ Priestly document
B Old Testament / Literary criticism |
Further subjects: | B
Bible. Exodus 1-15
B Exodus B Bible. Pentateuch B Priestly document |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
Summary: | Following in the steps of Rendtorff and Blum, recent research on the Pentateuch has concentrated on the nature of P – whether it is to be seen as source, redaction or composition. The author investigates the characteristics and problems of the 'P'-texts, mainly in Ex 1–7, and proposes an alternative explanation: The internal connections of the sub-units, the motifs with their own dynamic, and the way these passages function in their context suggest the interpretation of them as the voice of the narrator commenting on (and supplementing with them) the mainstream narrative. The texts generally attributed to P in Ex 1–15 seem to be less an independent source or redaction than another way of the narrator to give additional depth to his presentation. |
---|---|
Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|