Words

When explaining the inadequacy of the words “Cheer him up” to describe the purpose of offering a drink to a murderer, TS Elliot’s Sweeney remarks,Well here again that don’t applyBut I’ve gotta use words when I talk to you.1 The importance of words (or concepts) to medical ethics cannot be denied. Wh...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: McMillan, John (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2021
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 47, Issue: 9, Pages: 589
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:When explaining the inadequacy of the words “Cheer him up” to describe the purpose of offering a drink to a murderer, TS Elliot’s Sweeney remarks,Well here again that don’t applyBut I’ve gotta use words when I talk to you.1 The importance of words (or concepts) to medical ethics cannot be denied. While a narrow view of conceptual analysis is not conducive to good medical ethics,2 the adequacy and clarity of the words we use continues to be the foundation for all ethical analysis. While some key ideas such as ‘paternalism’3 or ‘coercion’4 are well theorised and tend to be used in a consistent way that most understand, other words that are important to ethics, often are not.Our ability to notice, perceive and understand ethical issues is the starting point for all ethical inquiry. The ethical words we choose structure and give content to our ethical perception. As Kant observed, ‘Thoughts without content are empty, intuitions without concepts are …
ISSN:1473-4257
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of medical ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1136/medethics-2021-107787