Commentary on the Olivieri symposium

The Canadian Bioethics Society has taken some constructive steps in its attempt to learn from the Olivieri case We would like to thank the authors and editors of the JME’s minisymposium on the Olivieri case in the February 2004 issue of the journal for continuing and extending the dialogue about thi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Chidwick, Paul 1930-2007 (Author) ; Connolly, E. (Author) ; Frolic, A. (Author) ; Hardingham, L. (Author) ; MacDonald, C. (Author) ; Murphy, P. (Author) ; Rodney, P. (Author) ; Webster, G. C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: BMJ Publ. 2004
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 2004, Volume: 30, Issue: 2, Pages: 231
Online Access: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:The Canadian Bioethics Society has taken some constructive steps in its attempt to learn from the Olivieri case We would like to thank the authors and editors of the JME’s minisymposium on the Olivieri case in the February 2004 issue of the journal for continuing and extending the dialogue about this important challenge to the North American bioethics community.This minisymposium is of special interest to us as members of the Canadian Bioethics Society’s (CBS) working group on employment standards for bioethics. We are members of this working group precisely because we believe that most of us in the Canadian bioethics community ought to do more to respond to situations such as the Olivieri/Apotex affair. We welcome the opportunity to continue to learn from the case and …
ISSN:1473-4257
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of medical ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1136/jme.2004.007815