Defending commercial surrogate motherhood against Van Niekerk and Van Zyl

The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that...

全面介紹

Saved in:  
書目詳細資料
主要作者: McLachlan, H. V. (Author)
格式: 電子 Article
語言:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
出版: 1997
In: Journal of medical ethics
Year: 1997, 卷: 23, 發布: 6, Pages: 344-348
在線閱讀: Volltext (JSTOR)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
實物特徵
總結:The arguments of Van Niekerk and Van Zyl that, on the grounds that it involves an inappropriate commodification and alienation of women's labour, commercial surrogate motherhood (CSM) is morally suspect are discussed and considered to be defective. In addition, doubt is cast on the notion that CSM should be illegal.
ISSN:1473-4257
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of medical ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1136/jme.23.6.344