Le conflit interne des mystiques Paulin D'Aumale († post 1694) et Janne Guyon (1648-1717)
In the wide-ranging debate caused by the emergence of mysticism in the modern sense, historiography has habitually given pride of place to harsh criticisms of this major trend, for which "the mystical" is no longer only an attibute but a substantive, representing a new discipline, notwiths...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | French |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Antonianum
Year: 2022, Volume: 97, Issue: 2, Pages: 395-411 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CB Christian life; spirituality KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history |
| Summary: | In the wide-ranging debate caused by the emergence of mysticism in the modern sense, historiography has habitually given pride of place to harsh criticisms of this major trend, for which "the mystical" is no longer only an attibute but a substantive, representing a new discipline, notwithstanding its complex genealogy. Now there is likewise dispute among those favourable to this form of modern spirituality. Furthermore, critics concentrate on the contributions of the Carmelites, the Augustinians or the Jesuits, of seculars such as Fénelon or lay persons like Jeanne Guyon, while paying little attention to the Franciscan approach. Here we will treat, not only of the point of view of a Franciscan, Paulin d'Aumale, whose complete works have now been published through our efforts, but also of the properly theological horizon of the question of unconditional love (pur amour), where we give priority to the approach of two Parisian_university masters, Godfrey of Fontaines and John Duns Scotus. En el inmenso debate suscitado por el surgimiento de la mística entendida en sentido moderno, la historiografía suele favorecer las críticas externas a esta gran corriente en la que la mística ya no es sólo un atributo sino el sustantivo de una nueva disciplina, a pesar de su compleja genealogía. Pero la disputa también se desarrolla en el ambiente favorable a esta forma de espiritualidad moderna. Además, la crítica atribuye un lugar destacado a las aportaciones de los carmelitas, los agustinos o los jesuitas, de los seculares como Fénelon o los laicos como Jeanne Guyon, evitando el enfoque franciscano. Aquí nos enfrentamos no sólo a la perspectiva de un franciscano como Paolino d'Aumale, cuya obra completa se acaba de publicar solo por nosotros, sino al horizonte estrictamente teológico de la cuestión del amor puro, donde prefereimos el enfoque de dos maestros universitarios parisinos, Godofredo de Fontaines y Juan Duns Escoto. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0003-6064 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Antonianum
|