Revisiting Bavinck on Hegel: Providence, reason, and the unsublatable

Herman Bavinck's reception of the organic motif has become in recent years the central locus for discussing the means by which the unity of his thought may be recognised. This article provides a critical reading of Bavinck on Hegel on the locus of providence for the purpose of contributing to t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Tseng, Shao Kai 1981- (Author) ; Sutanto, Nathaniel Gray 1991- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2022
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 75, Issue: 3, Pages: 221-234
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831 / Bavinck, Herman 1854-1921 / Providence / Creature / Schöpferkraft Gottes / Dogmatics / Philosophy
IxTheo Classification:KAH Church history 1648-1913; modern history
NBA Dogmatics
NBC Doctrine of God
NBD Doctrine of Creation
NBL Doctrine of Predestination
VA Philosophy
Further subjects:B Providence
B G. W. F. Hegel
B Idealism
B Herman Bavinck
B Reformed Theology
B Organicism
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Herman Bavinck's reception of the organic motif has become in recent years the central locus for discussing the means by which the unity of his thought may be recognised. This article provides a critical reading of Bavinck on Hegel on the locus of providence for the purpose of contributing to the ongoing discussion that identifies the unity of Bavinck's thought not in his confessional self in simple opposition against the philosophies of his day, but rather in characterising Bavinck as an eclectic, orthodox and modern theologian. To this end this essay moves in three steps. First, we provide an analysis that showcases the nuanced points of contact between Bavinck and Hegel on providence. Second, the essay homes in on the specific ways in which the two thinkers diverge on the Creator-creature relationship. Finally, we close the essay by sketching the salient dogmatic and philosophical implications of the preceding analysis.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contains:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930622000321