Revisiting Bavinck on Hegel: Providence, reason, and the unsublatable
Herman Bavinck's reception of the organic motif has become in recent years the central locus for discussing the means by which the unity of his thought may be recognised. This article provides a critical reading of Bavinck on Hegel on the locus of providence for the purpose of contributing to t...
| Autori: | ; |
|---|---|
| Tipo di documento: | Elettronico Articolo |
| Lingua: | Inglese |
| Verificare la disponibilità: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Pubblicazione: |
2022
|
| In: |
Scottish journal of theology
Anno: 2022, Volume: 75, Fascicolo: 3, Pagine: 221-234 |
| (sequenze di) soggetti normati: | B
Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich 1770-1831
/ Bavinck, Herman 1854-1921
/ Provvidenza
/ Creatura
/ Schöpferkraft Gottes
/ Dogmatica
/ Filosofia
|
| Notazioni IxTheo: | KAH Età moderna NBA Dogmatica NBC Dio NBD Creazione NBL Predestinazione VA Filosofia |
| Altre parole chiave: | B
Providence
B G. W. F. Hegel B Idealism B Herman Bavinck B Reformed Theology B Organicism |
| Accesso online: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Riepilogo: | Herman Bavinck's reception of the organic motif has become in recent years the central locus for discussing the means by which the unity of his thought may be recognised. This article provides a critical reading of Bavinck on Hegel on the locus of providence for the purpose of contributing to the ongoing discussion that identifies the unity of Bavinck's thought not in his confessional self in simple opposition against the philosophies of his day, but rather in characterising Bavinck as an eclectic, orthodox and modern theologian. To this end this essay moves in three steps. First, we provide an analysis that showcases the nuanced points of contact between Bavinck and Hegel on providence. Second, the essay homes in on the specific ways in which the two thinkers diverge on the Creator-creature relationship. Finally, we close the essay by sketching the salient dogmatic and philosophical implications of the preceding analysis. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1475-3065 |
| Comprende: | Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1017/S0036930622000321 |
