‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
| Idioma: | Inglês |
| Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Carregar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| Em: |
Bioethics
Ano: 2022, Volume: 36, Número: 7, Páginas: 774-782 |
| Classificações IxTheo: | NCB Ética individual NCH Ética da medicina XA Direito |
| Outras palavras-chave: | B
Consent
B neurocorrectives B criminal rehabilitation B Beneficence B protections against abuse B neurolaw |
| Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |