‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
| Auteur principal: | |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| Dans: |
Bioethics
Année: 2022, Volume: 36, Numéro: 7, Pages: 774-782 |
| Classifications IxTheo: | NCB Éthique individuelle NCH Éthique médicale XA Droit |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Consent
B neurocorrectives B criminal rehabilitation B Beneficence B protections against abuse B neurolaw |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |