‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
| Autor principal: | |
|---|---|
| Tipo de documento: | Electrónico Artículo |
| Lenguaje: | Inglés |
| Verificar disponibilidad: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Gargar...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publicado: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| En: |
Bioethics
Año: 2022, Volumen: 36, Número: 7, Páginas: 774-782 |
| Clasificaciones IxTheo: | NCB Ética individual NCH Ética de la medicina XA Derecho |
| Otras palabras clave: | B
Consent
B neurocorrectives B criminal rehabilitation B Beneficence B protections against abuse B neurolaw |
| Acceso en línea: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |