‘If we don't have consent, we need to have beneficence’: Requiring beneficence in nonconsensual neurocorrection
Neurointerventions—interventions that cause direct physical, chemical or biological effects on the brain—are sometimes administered to criminal offenders for the purpose of reducing their recidivism risk and promoting their rehabilitation more generally. Ethical debate on this practice (henceforth c...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
| In: |
Bioethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 36, Issue: 7, Pages: 774-782 |
| IxTheo Classification: | NCB Personal ethics NCH Medical ethics XA Law |
| Further subjects: | B
Consent
B neurocorrectives B criminal rehabilitation B Beneficence B protections against abuse B neurolaw |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |