Repaying the debt: an examination of the relationship between perceived organizational support and unethical pro-organizational behavior by low performers

Drawing on social exchange theory, we examine the conditions under which employees’ good intentions motivate them to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) and the psychological mechanism behind this behavioral decision. Findings from a time-lagged field study and a scenario study ind...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wang, Xiaoyu (Author) ; Zheng, Xiaotong (Author) ; Zhao, Shuming (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Springer 2022
In: Journal of business ethics
Year: 2022, Volume: 179, Issue: 3, Pages: 697-709
Further subjects:B Perceived organizational support
B Task Performance
B Aufsatz in Zeitschrift
B Unethical pro-organizational behavior
B Social Exchange
B Indebtedness
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:Drawing on social exchange theory, we examine the conditions under which employees’ good intentions motivate them to engage in unethical pro-organizational behavior (UPB) and the psychological mechanism behind this behavioral decision. Findings from a time-lagged field study and a scenario study indicate (1) an interactive effect between perceived organizational support and employee performance on UPB; (2) that low performers who perceive high levels of organizational support are more likely to engage in UPB; and (3) that feelings of indebtedness to the organization mediate the interactive effect on UPB. Therefore, the paper highlights the importance of conditional factors in motivating UPB by combining employee ‘good intentions’ and ‘disadvantageous situations’ to understand the UPB decision process. The paper concludes with theoretical and practical implications.
ISSN:1573-0697
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of business ethics
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1007/s10551-021-04809-0