God's world - God's body
If the majority of process theologians and some feminist theologians are right, then God’s world can be understood as God’s body. A view that reveals environmental degradation in a different light. The essay ‘God’s World – God’s Body’ first of all presents Charles Hartshorne’s as well as Sallie McFa...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2013
|
| In: |
Embodied religion
Year: 2013, Pages: 229-240 |
| Further subjects: | B
Process theology
B Environmental degradation B Panentheism B World B Body B Environment (Art) B Feminist Theology |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
| Summary: | If the majority of process theologians and some feminist theologians are right, then God’s world can be understood as God’s body. A view that reveals environmental degradation in a different light. The essay ‘God’s World – God’s Body’ first of all presents Charles Hartshorne’s as well as Sallie McFague’s panentheistic conception of God. Both concepts stress the idea of God’s corporeality. In a second step the author hints at the concepts’ environmental implications; she explains what the consequences are, if Hartshorne and McFague are to be correct. Finally, the previously said opens out into showing in how far a movement ‘back-to-religion’ implies a ‘back-to-nature-’ movement. |
|---|---|
| ISBN: | 9067010332 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Conference (European Society for Philosophy of Religion : 19. : 30.08.-02.09.2012 : Soesterberg), Embodied religion
|