Two models of Confucian democracy: A contrastive analysis of Tang Junyi’s and Mou Zongsan’s political philosophy

In the final decades of the 20th century, the majority of modern Sinophone scholars believed that Confucianism was an outdated and obsolete ideology that was not only unsuitable for the development of modern science and democratic societies, but also responsible for the deep social and political cri...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rošker, Jana S. 1960- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Carfax 2022
In: Asian philosophy
Year: 2022, Volume: 32, Issue: 3, Pages: 350-363
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Tang, Junyi 1909-1978 / Mou, Zongsan 1909-1995 / Confucianism / Democracy / The Modern
IxTheo Classification:AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism
AD Sociology of religion; religious policy
BM Chinese universism; Confucianism; Taoism
KBM Asia
TK Recent history
ZC Politics in general
Further subjects:B science and democracy
B Taiwanese philosophy
B modern Confucianism
B Confucianism
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1811121659
003 DE-627
005 20221101162659.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220721s2022 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/09552367.2022.2083301  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1811121659 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1811121659 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 0  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1022080628  |0 (DE-627)71586047X  |0 (DE-576)306247291  |4 aut  |a Rošker, Jana S.  |d 1960- 
109 |a Rošker, Jana S. 1960-  |a Rošker, Jana 1960-  |a Rosker, Jana 1960- 
245 1 0 |a Two models of Confucian democracy: A contrastive analysis of Tang Junyi’s and Mou Zongsan’s political philosophy 
264 1 |c 2022 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the final decades of the 20th century, the majority of modern Sinophone scholars believed that Confucianism was an outdated and obsolete ideology that was not only unsuitable for the development of modern science and democratic societies, but also responsible for the deep social and political crisis that had branded China for the previous two centuries. Modern New Confucians, however, never assumed that the Confucian system was responsible for such a situation. Most of them believed that Confucianism was compatible with science and democracy. Moreover, the majority of them assumed that the East Asian cultures would never be able to develop truly democratic structures of their societies unless they incorporated the appropriate elements of their own, i.e. Confucian, traditions. This paper critically analyses the theoretical models of Tang Junyi and Mou Zongsan on the possible revival and development of Confucian proto-democracies. 
601 |a Philosophie 
650 4 |a science and democracy 
650 4 |a Taiwanese philosophy 
650 4 |a modern Confucianism 
650 4 |a Confucianism 
652 |a AB:AD:BM:KBM:TK:ZC 
689 0 0 |d p  |0 (DE-588)119037114  |0 (DE-627)079826237  |0 (DE-576)189608315  |2 gnd  |a Tang, Junyi  |d 1909-1978 
689 0 1 |d p  |0 (DE-588)120093820  |0 (DE-627)080441998  |0 (DE-576)213043246  |2 gnd  |a Mou, Zongsan  |d 1909-1995 
689 0 2 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4032089-3  |0 (DE-627)106262947  |0 (DE-576)208995579  |2 gnd  |a Konfuzianismus 
689 0 3 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4011413-2  |0 (DE-627)106352873  |0 (DE-576)208893415  |2 gnd  |a Demokratie 
689 0 4 |d s  |0 (DE-588)4039827-4  |0 (DE-627)104658711  |0 (DE-576)209036745  |2 gnd  |a Moderne 
689 0 |5 (DE-627) 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Asian philosophy  |d London [u.a.] : Carfax, 1991  |g 32(2022), 3, Seite 350-363  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)320310922  |w (DE-600)2025427-1  |w (DE-576)094080704  |x 1469-2961  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:32  |g year:2022  |g number:3  |g pages:350-363 
856 |u https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/09552367.2022.2083301?needAccess=true  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h publisher [open (via crossref license)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/09552367.2022.2083301  |x Resolving-System  |z kostenfrei  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 417132727X 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1811121659 
LOK |0 005 20221101162659 
LOK |0 008 220721||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-07-20#9C8C1EFCB603C7A9B3BBDFAF41314736D7CB92D0 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442042990  |a AB 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043016  |a AD 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442043660  |a BM 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 144204893X  |a KBM 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442053887  |a TK 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1550736965  |a ZC 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw 
REL |a 1 
STA 0 0 |a Confucianism,Philosophy, Confucian,Democracy,Democracy,The Modern,The Modern,Modern age,Modernity 
STB 0 0 |a Confucianisme,Démocratie,Démocratie,Modernité,Modernité,Époque moderne,Époque moderne,Époque moderne (motif),Époque moderne 
STC 0 0 |a Confucianismo,Democracia,Democracia,Modernidad,Modernidad 
STD 0 0 |a Confucianesimo,Democrazia,Democrazia,Modernità <motivo>,Modernità,Moderno,Moderno,Moderno (motivo),Moderno 
STE 0 0 |a 儒家,儒学,民主,民主,民主主义,民主制度,民主主义,民主制度,现代性 
STF 0 0 |a 儒家,儒學,民主,民主,民主主義,民主制度,民主主義,民主制度,現代性 
STG 0 0 |a Confucianismo,Democracia,Democracia,Modernidade,Modernidade 
STH 0 0 |a Демократия (мотив),Демократия,Конфуцианство,Эпоха Модерна (мотив),Эпоха Модерна 
STI 0 0 |a Δημοκρατία (μοτίβο),Δημοκρατία,Κομφουκιανισμός,Το Μοντέρνο (μοτίβο),Το Μοντέρνο 
SUB |a REL 
SYG 0 0 |a T'ang, Chün-i,1909-1978,Tang, Yibo,1909-1978,T'ang, I-bo,1909-1978 , Mo, Chong-sam,1909-1995,Mou, Tsung-san,1909-1995,Mou, Tzung-san,1909-1995,Mou, Zong san,1909-1995,Mou Zongsan,1909-1995,Mou Zong san,1909-1995 , Confucianism , Volksherrschaft,Demokratischer Staat , Avantgarde