Ecofeminist and Feminist Theologies: The Necessity to Consider the Protection of Creation
As an example of contextual biblical interpretation, this article offers a reaction to the Joint Message for the Protection of Creation. After some observations on the seven biblical texts used, contributions that feminist and ecofeminist theologies would have made to the document are evaluated. The...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
SCM Press
2022
|
| In: |
Concilium
Year: 2022, Issue: 3, Pages: 134-138 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Eine gemeinsame Botschaft für die Bewahrung der Schöpfung
/ Environmental ethics
/ Feminist theology
/ Ecofeminism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | FD Contextual theology KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history KDJ Ecumenism NCG Environmental ethics; Creation ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
Theology
B Gender |
| Summary: | As an example of contextual biblical interpretation, this article offers a reaction to the Joint Message for the Protection of Creation. After some observations on the seven biblical texts used, contributions that feminist and ecofeminist theologies would have made to the document are evaluated. The document has a concern for poor people, without observing the multiple oppressions of gender, class, ethnicity, and others that affect the majority of the mentioned poor people (feminist contributions). Nor does it consider the intersection between these oppressions and the abuse of the planet, both manifestations of the patriarchal binary hierarchy (ecofeminist contributions). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 0010-5236 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Concilium
|