Absent dead, and abstract signs for absence: on the semiotic affordance of religion

I argue that the capacity of the human mind to understand and use signs with arbitrary relations between signifier and signified emerged with abstract signs that signify an irreversibly ‘absent’ (used as a noun here), or the absence of an earlier presence. The cognitive capacity, relevant for religi...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Religion
Main Author: Schlieter, Jens 1966- (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge 2022
In: Religion
Year: 2022, Volume: 52, Issue: 3, Pages: 409-428
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Semiotics / Abstraction / Death / Mourning rites / Cognition / Anthropology of religion / Religion / History 50000 BC-40000 BC
IxTheo Classification:AA Study of religion
AE Psychology of religion
AG Religious life; material religion
TB Antiquity
Further subjects:B Paleaolithic religion
B origin of religion
B Dead
B Absence
B Death
B Saussurean signs
B religious affordance
B death rites
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:I argue that the capacity of the human mind to understand and use signs with arbitrary relations between signifier and signified emerged with abstract signs that signify an irreversibly ‘absent’ (used as a noun here), or the absence of an earlier presence. The cognitive capacity, relevant for religiously relevant perceptions, could probably have emerged in the Early Upper Paleolithic era (c. 50.000–40.000 BP). Abstract signs allowed humans to refer to a dead human, a permanent ‘absentee,’ or simply, an ‘absent’ – a certain former member of the group. Thus, they signify absence of a formerly present individual, and allow to externalize complex emotions. These abstract sings for absence, possibly rocks and stones, and respective emotions such as collective mourning became on their part, it is argued, the basis for religious perceptions such as memorial practices.
ISSN:1096-1151
Contains:Enthalten in: Religion
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1080/0048721X.2022.2029780