A Response to Haynes
Haynes' (this issue) engagement with a Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships and critique of some of Hardy's (this issue) claims are reframed in terms of: methodological differences between the psychology of religion and theological integration of psycho...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2000
|
| In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 2000, Volume: 28, Issue: 4, Pages: 280-281 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | Haynes' (this issue) engagement with a Winnicottian redescription of Christian spiritual direction relationships and critique of some of Hardy's (this issue) claims are reframed in terms of: methodological differences between the psychology of religion and theological integration of psychology, and theological differences regarding the nature of human-divine interaction. A justification is offered for including transference-countertransference issues in discussions of the role of spiritual directors. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164710002800406 |
