Response to Oosterhuis: Discipline versus Punishment
The authors critique Oosterhuis's article “Abolishing the Rod,” Journal of Psychology and Theology, 21, 127–133. Central to the critique is the distinction between discipline and punishment, which is unclear in Oosterhuis's discussion. Response also contends that punishment is not obsolete...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publishing
1993
|
| In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1993, Volume: 21, Issue: 2, Pages: 134-137 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The authors critique Oosterhuis's article “Abolishing the Rod,” Journal of Psychology and Theology, 21, 127–133. Central to the critique is the distinction between discipline and punishment, which is unclear in Oosterhuis's discussion. Response also contends that punishment is not obsolete merely because it is ancient; the “radical change” between Old and New Testaments is challenged; and the source of authority is ascribed to Scripture rather than trends of modern educational psychology. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164719302100203 |