Ambiguity in Neuropsychology: A Response to Wong
The author responds to Wong's (1984) critique and caution about what is “known” in neuropsychology as the basis for correlating empirical and theological understandings. The issue of insufficient caution, the nature of the evidence, definitions and supporting data, and the recommendation to ign...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sage Publishing
1984
|
| In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1984, Volume: 12, Issue: 4, Pages: 314-319 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | The author responds to Wong's (1984) critique and caution about what is “known” in neuropsychology as the basis for correlating empirical and theological understandings. The issue of insufficient caution, the nature of the evidence, definitions and supporting data, and the recommendation to ignore lateral differences are examined in light of what is known and how it is interpreted. Wong's critique permits the author to qualify the interpretation more carefully and to indicate his own convictions about faith. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164718401200407 |