Guilt: Three Models of Therapy
After reviewing a dynamic model of guilt interpreted within a theological framework three approaches to guilt reduction are discussed. It is concluded that therapeutic attempts to either improve behavior or modify one's standards leave the major crux of the guilt dilemma untouched. Only a model...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Sage Publishing
1974
|
In: |
Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1974, Volume: 2, Issue: 4, Pages: 260-265 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | After reviewing a dynamic model of guilt interpreted within a theological framework three approaches to guilt reduction are discussed. It is concluded that therapeutic attempts to either improve behavior or modify one's standards leave the major crux of the guilt dilemma untouched. Only a model of guilt reduction that gives primary attention to the nature and origin of the punitive guilt feelings can be fully effective. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2328-1162 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1177/009164717400200402 |