Contract Therapy and the Christian Covenant

The objections to Contract Therapy by Christian psychologists and clientele are on two levels: (a) It is a neutral, and thus secular methodology; (b) it is specifically non-Christian in both its theory and application, i.e., it is an attempt to impose law upon a relationship rather than to introduce...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tweedie, Donald F. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Sage Publishing 1973
In: Journal of psychology and theology
Year: 1973, Volume: 1, Issue: 2, Pages: 73-76
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:The objections to Contract Therapy by Christian psychologists and clientele are on two levels: (a) It is a neutral, and thus secular methodology; (b) it is specifically non-Christian in both its theory and application, i.e., it is an attempt to impose law upon a relationship rather than to introduce grace; and it appeals to personal privilege and a negotiated catering to personal self-interest. It is suggested that, like any other counseling formula, Contract Therapy is non-neutral as it will tend to reflect the value system of the therapist. Also, the negotiating of a “better covenant” in marital therapy, instead of being non-Christian, is more likely to provide an atmosphere of gracious relationship that comports well with the evangel.
ISSN:2328-1162
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of psychology and theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1177/009164717300100216