Setting Risk Limits and Ensuring Fairness in Learning Health Care

Historical abuses resulted in the segregation of clinical research and clinical care. While this approach has protected participants, it is extremely inefficient, leading commentators to propose (re)integrating research and care into learning health care systems. Previous commentators have argued th...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Wendler, David Sheffer 1961- (Author) ; Sullivan, Connor (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Interlibrary Loan:Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany)
Published: 2022
In: The Hastings Center report
Year: 2022, Volume: 52, Issue: 3, Pages: 34-36
Further subjects:B compulsory research
B Fair play
B Bioethics
B learning health care systems
B minimal risk research
B research ethics
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Historical abuses resulted in the segregation of clinical research and clinical care. While this approach has protected participants, it is extremely inefficient, leading commentators to propose (re)integrating research and care into learning health care systems. Previous commentators have argued that, in these systems, it could be appropriate to condition care on patients’ consent to participation in research, but only when the added research risks are minimal. In the article “Compulsory Research in Learning Health Care: Against a Minimal Risk Limit,” Robert Steel agrees about making research participation a condition for receiving care in these systems, but he argues that the limit to minimal risks is unfounded, and he offers compelling reasons to think that, in principle, permitting greater research risks could be fair and consistent with individual rights. Unfortunately, the nature of current institutions suggests that this approach is unlikely to be implemented fairly. We conclude that, to ensure fair learning health care systems, research and care may need to be reformed in more fundamental ways.
ISSN:1552-146X
Contains:Enthalten in: Hastings Center, The Hastings Center report
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1002/hast.1395