[Rezension von: Carnley, Peter Frederick, 1937-, The Reconstruction of Resurrection Belief]
This book seeks to articulate an understanding of resurrection faith as ‘a response of trust based upon a knowledge by acquaintance with the living presence of Christ today’ (back cover). A main focus is to address the epistemological question how ‘to identify what is claimed to be known in faith as...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Review |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Oxford University Press
2021
|
| In: |
The journal of theological studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 72, Issue: 2, Pages: 1055-1057 |
| Review of: | The Reconstruction of Resurrection Belief (Cambridge : James Clarke, 2020) (Loke, Andrew Ter Ern)
The Reconstruction of Resurrection Belief (Bristol : James Clarke Company, Limited, 2020) (Loke, Andrew Ter Ern) |
| Further subjects: | B
Book review
|
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This book seeks to articulate an understanding of resurrection faith as ‘a response of trust based upon a knowledge by acquaintance with the living presence of Christ today’ (back cover). A main focus is to address the epistemological question how ‘to identify what is claimed to be known in faith as the actual living presence today of the historical Jesus of Nazareth who lived in Palestine in the first century’ (p. 5). Carnley rejects both the ‘historical proof’ approach (Carnley mentions N. T. Wright and Wolfhart Pannenberg as examples) and the fideist approach (e.g. Karl Barth) (pp. 1-2). Instead he seeks to base his argument on the characteristics of the present experience of encountering Jesus (p. 55). |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1477-4607 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The journal of theological studies
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1093/jts/flab106 |