Ransom theory in a new economy: Recontextualising a metaphor

This article demonstrates that an economic context is essential to the metaphor that Anselm of Canterbury and Peter Abelard used in their arguments against a ransom theory of atonement. Contrary to typical analyses, which suggest their metaphor makes a point about obedience or honour that slaves or...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sutherland, Andrew W. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Cambridge Univ. Press 2022
In: Scottish journal of theology
Year: 2021, Volume: 74, Issue: 4, Pages: 312-322
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains:B Abaelard, Peter 1079-1142 / Anselm, Canterbury, Erzbischof, Heiliger 1033-1109 / Ransom / Soteriology
IxTheo Classification:KAE Church history 900-1300; high Middle Ages
NBK Soteriology
Further subjects:B Economy
B Anselm of Canterbury
B Peter Abelard
B manorialism
B ransom theory
B Property
Online Access: Volltext (kostenfrei)
Volltext (kostenfrei)
Description
Summary:This article demonstrates that an economic context is essential to the metaphor that Anselm of Canterbury and Peter Abelard used in their arguments against a ransom theory of atonement. Contrary to typical analyses, which suggest their metaphor makes a point about obedience or honour that slaves or servants owe to a master or king, this metaphor in fact suggests relations between the lord of a manor and his servi - serfs bound to the land, perpetually indebted to the lord and effectively considered his property. Should servi attempt to desert their lord, he had the right simply to reclaim them wherever they went. Insofar as this right voided the servus’ choice to leave their lord, the metaphorical framework of manorial economy ruled out the ‘rights of the devil’ in a way previous debt-slavery and military frameworks for ransom theory (in themselves) did not.
ISSN:1475-3065
Contains:Enthalten in: Scottish journal of theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1017/S0036930621000727