The accumulation of penal and contentious actions: some procedural considerations
Factinspecies. – Observations: 1. If none of the parties makes an objection, may a judge be considered to have legitimately established a doubt when he acts motu proprio ac sine petitione iudicali? – 2. Can the parties be said to have in fact consented to the introduction of the question of an inval...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Print Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Libreria Editrice Vaticana
2011
|
| In: |
Quaderni dello studio rotale
Year: 2011, Volume: 21, Pages: 83-90 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Catholic church, Rota Romana
/ Akkumulation
/ Punishment
/ Process
/ Marriage
/ Marriage process
|
| Summary: | Factinspecies. – Observations: 1. If none of the parties makes an objection, may a judge be considered to have legitimately established a doubt when he acts motu proprio ac sine petitione iudicali? – 2. Can the parties be said to have in fact consented to the introduction of the question of an invalid incardination? – 3. Might the promoter of justice have acted to introduce such a case, whether independently or by the way of accumulation with a criminal case? – 4. Is the question of the possible invalid incardination of the accused exclusively an administrative one? – 5. Singular administrative acts and their revision. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Quaderni dello studio rotale
|