Two French Views of the Council of Trent
This article contrasts two sixteenth-century French works on the Council of Trent. In 1564 Charles du Moulin wrote his Conseil sur le faict du concile de Trente. In this work du Moulin attempted to persuade royal officials that the Tridentine decrees should not be received in France. Nearly twenty y...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Sixteenth Century Journal Publishers, Inc.
1988
|
| In: |
The sixteenth century journal
Year: 1988, Volume: 19, Issue: 2, Pages: 169-186 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
Non-electronic |
| Summary: | This article contrasts two sixteenth-century French works on the Council of Trent. In 1564 Charles du Moulin wrote his Conseil sur le faict du concile de Trente. In this work du Moulin attempted to persuade royal officials that the Tridentine decrees should not be received in France. Nearly twenty years later Pierre Gregoire of Toulouse wrote a major response to du Moulin's Conseil. In this response Gregoire strongly recommended royal reception of the decrees. The debate over reception of the Tridentine decrees helped to determine the subsequent status of the Catholic church in France. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2326-0726 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: The sixteenth century journal
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/2540405 |