From goodness to good looks: Changing images of human germline genetic modification
When writing about deliberate changes to the human germline, bioethicists tend not to discuss the modification of specific genes and instead refer to broader concepts like making people smarter, taller, or longer-lived. Only a limited number of these traits are mentioned regularly in the literature....
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Tipo de documento: | Recurso Electrónico Artigo |
Idioma: | Inglês |
Verificar disponibilidade: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Publicado em: |
Wiley-Blackwell
2022
|
Em: |
Bioethics
Ano: 2022, Volume: 36, Número: 5, Páginas: 556-568 |
Classificações IxTheo: | NCH Ética da medicina NCJ Ética da ciência |
Outras palavras-chave: | B
cosmetic enhancement
B moral enhancement B history of bioethics B human germline genetic modification B Edição de genoma B rhetoric of bioethics |
Acesso em linha: |
Volltext (kostenfrei) Volltext (kostenfrei) |
Resumo: | When writing about deliberate changes to the human germline, bioethicists tend not to discuss the modification of specific genes and instead refer to broader concepts like making people smarter, taller, or longer-lived. Only a limited number of these traits are mentioned regularly in the literature. Examples like health and intelligence appear frequently at all stages of the germline modification discourse, but the third most frequently mentioned trait has shifted over time. Prior to the early 1980s, publications discussed giving humans a kinder temperament significantly more often than cosmetic modifications, while more recent works reverse the frequency of these traits. Contributing factors likely include a greater focus on individual decision-making, combined with the increasing uptake of real-world reproductive technologies like IVF and gamete donation. This shifting imagery could have a profound influence on the way scholars develop arguments about gene editing since cosmetic modifications are generally viewed more negatively and considered less relevant to the identity of future people. In comparison with earlier images of germline modification, they also suggest a more contemporary, Western, and politically liberal social context for gene editing technology. Examining how authors move between writing about different traits can also help us to be aware of the traits that are arbitrarily omitted from the discourse and to consider our preparedness for unexpected kinds of modification. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1467-8519 |
Obras secundárias: | Enthalten in: Bioethics
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1111/bioe.12913 |