Meaninglessness, Meaningfulness, and Super-Meaningfulness in Scripture: An Analysis of the Controversy Surrounding Dan 2:12 in the Middle Ages

Does the midrashic principle of biblical omnisignificance have an echo in peshaṭ exegesis? How far may a pashṭan go in cutting Scripture down to size? Is meaninglessness ever an option? These are the questions lurking just beneath the surface of the medieval controversy surrounding Dan 2:12. Dunash&...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Steiner, Richard C. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Penn Press 1992
In: The Jewish quarterly review
Year: 1992, Volume: 82, Issue: 3/4, Pages: 431-449
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Does the midrashic principle of biblical omnisignificance have an echo in peshaṭ exegesis? How far may a pashṭan go in cutting Scripture down to size? Is meaninglessness ever an option? These are the questions lurking just beneath the surface of the medieval controversy surrounding Dan 2:12. Dunash's analysis of ‮בנס וקצף שגיא‬ in that verse as a prepositional phrase ("in great agitation and anger") rather than a verb phrase coordinate with the following ‮ואמר וגו׳‬ ("got very upset and angry and gave an order..."), forced him to take the - ‮ו‬ of ‮ואמר‬ as meaningless. Despite the many parallels he cited, not everyone was convinced. Even some of the exegetes who accepted his analysis of ‮בנס וקצף שגיא‬ rejected his view of the following - ‮ו‬. Among them was Joseph Qimḥi, who turned Dunash's meaningless - ‮ו‬ into a super-meaningful one by positing an ellipsis before it. Another application of the omnisignificance principle can be seen in R. Tam's use of Dan 3:13 as a parallel to Dan 2:12, which betrays an aversion to meaningless variation. Further aspects of the question remain to be investigated, but preliminary research suggests that attitudes toward the omnisignificance principle may be a variable which can serve to establish a new classification of medieval pashṭanim.
ISSN:1553-0604
Contains:Enthalten in: The Jewish quarterly review
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.2307/1454866