Values in the workplace: Diversity in meaning and importance
This study, which was a replication and expansion of the Homant (1970) values study, proposed an alternative conceptualization to the study of value meaning and importance. Value meaning, value importance, and schema were explored through a repeated measures design. As predicted, there was more agre...
| Authors: | ; |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Proquest
1996
|
| In: |
International journal of value-based management
Year: 1996, Volume: 9, Issue: 2, Pages: 169-194 |
| Further subjects: | B
value importance
B Schema B value meaning |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | This study, which was a replication and expansion of the Homant (1970) values study, proposed an alternative conceptualization to the study of value meaning and importance. Value meaning, value importance, and schema were explored through a repeated measures design. As predicted, there was more agreement across subjects of the meaning of nonvalue words than on the meaning of value words. Hypotheses regarding value ranking across sex types, as well as denotative versus connotative value meanings and value importance were not supported. Methodological issues and suggestions for future research are discussed. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8528 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: International journal of value-based management
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF00440153 |