Fundamental and technical methods of ethics
Consequentialists and deontologists alike tacitly presume that moral decisions should be reached from basic assessments of theoretically set moral value. The presumption they share, I argue, is seriously mistaken. We need to distinguish two general methods of reaching moral decisions, that of the mo...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Proquest
1996
|
| In: |
International journal of value-based management
Year: 1996, Volume: 9, Issue: 1, Pages: 89-100 |
| Further subjects: | B
Decision-making
B Ethics B moral decision B Deontology B fundamental analysis B Moral Philosophy B technical analysis B Values B moral values B Consequentialism |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1801629781 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220512053255.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220512s1996 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1007/BF00420510 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1801629781 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1801629781 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Magnell, Thomas |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Fundamental and technical methods of ethics |
| 264 | 1 | |c 1996 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Consequentialists and deontologists alike tacitly presume that moral decisions should be reached from basic assessments of theoretically set moral value. The presumption they share, I argue, is seriously mistaken. We need to distinguish two general methods of reaching moral decisions, that of the moral fundamentalist and that of the moral technician. Moral fundamentalists and technicians differ in their methods, but not in their aims. The distinction between the two general methods of ethics is particularly important for consequentialism. I maintain that a consequentialist may be without inconsistency a utilitarian fundamentalist and a deontological technician. I suggest that when we pay heed to our epistemic constraints, we have strong consequentialist grounds for adopting this unusual position. | ||
| 601 | |a Fundament | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a technical analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a fundamental analysis | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Values | |
| 650 | 4 | |a moral decision | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Decision-making | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Deontology | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Consequentialism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Moral Philosophy | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Ethics | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t International journal of value-based management |d [Erscheinungsort nicht ermittelbar] : Proquest, 1997 |g 9(1996), 1, Seite 89-100 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)270937064 |w (DE-600)1478685-0 |w (DE-576)12119048X |x 1572-8528 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:9 |g year:1996 |g number:1 |g pages:89-100 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00420510 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 935 | |a mteo | ||
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4132935027 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1801629781 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220512053255 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220512||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 035 |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-04-22#532648604449F8E872497EA5B5819A7B4FE554A9 | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixrk |a zota | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||