The abortion issue and Title VII employment discrimination: The microcosm of the law
This paper presents a discussion of a 1989 United States federal appeals court ruling in the case of Doe v. First National Bank. The case is the first ruling on the federal appellate level involving a claim of Title VII employment discrimination based upon alleged employer knowledge of and animus to...
| Auteurs: | ; ; |
|---|---|
| Type de support: | Électronique Article |
| Langue: | Anglais |
| Vérifier la disponibilité: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | En cours de chargement...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Publié: |
Proquest
1990
|
| Dans: |
International journal of value-based management
Année: 1990, Volume: 3, Numéro: 2, Pages: 113-124 |
| Sujets non-standardisés: | B
Social Issue
B Excellent Tool B Business Ethic B Court Ruling B Ethical Question |
| Accès en ligne: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Résumé: | This paper presents a discussion of a 1989 United States federal appeals court ruling in the case of Doe v. First National Bank. The case is the first ruling on the federal appellate level involving a claim of Title VII employment discrimination based upon alleged employer knowledge of and animus towards an employee who had undergone an abortion. Doe raises the ethical questions of how a highly charged, national social issue can be reduced to interpersonal dealings between a supervisor and her subordinate in the workplace. The facts of the case are presented in a chronological manner, followed by a discussion of both the court rulings in the case and the utility of employing this case as an excellent tool in the teaching of business ethics and society. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1572-8528 |
| Contient: | Enthalten in: International journal of value-based management
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1007/BF01732417 |