Retaking Mars Hill: Evaluating the Presuppositional Interpretation of Acts 17:16–34
Presuppositionalists argue that Paul’s address at Mars Hill offers biblical grounds for presuppositional apologetics and that evidentialists misinterpret the same address in support of their own position. A critical evaluation of this claim requires the examination of six issues in Acts 17:16-34 whi...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Brill
2021
|
| In: |
The Evangelical quarterly
Year: 2021, Volume: 92, Issue: 4, Pages: 328-350 |
| Further subjects: | B
Presuppositionalism
B EVIDENTIALISM B Proof B Mars Hill B Apologetics |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
MARC
| LEADER | 00000naa a22000002 4500 | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | 1800264151 | ||
| 003 | DE-627 | ||
| 005 | 20220426105203.0 | ||
| 007 | cr uuu---uuuuu | ||
| 008 | 220426s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c | ||
| 024 | 7 | |a 10.1163/27725472-09204003 |2 doi | |
| 035 | |a (DE-627)1800264151 | ||
| 035 | |a (DE-599)KXP1800264151 | ||
| 040 | |a DE-627 |b ger |c DE-627 |e rda | ||
| 041 | |a eng | ||
| 084 | |a 1 |2 ssgn | ||
| 100 | 1 | |a Wiley, Daniel |e VerfasserIn |4 aut | |
| 245 | 1 | 0 | |a Retaking Mars Hill: Evaluating the Presuppositional Interpretation of Acts 17:16–34 |
| 264 | 1 | |c 2021 | |
| 336 | |a Text |b txt |2 rdacontent | ||
| 337 | |a Computermedien |b c |2 rdamedia | ||
| 338 | |a Online-Ressource |b cr |2 rdacarrier | ||
| 520 | |a Presuppositionalists argue that Paul’s address at Mars Hill offers biblical grounds for presuppositional apologetics and that evidentialists misinterpret the same address in support of their own position. A critical evaluation of this claim requires the examination of six issues in Acts 17:16-34 which have implications for apologetic method: (1) Paul’s pre-Mars Hill ministry in Athens; (2) The captatio benevolentiae of Paul’s exordium; (3) The Unknown God; (4) The parallels to Greek philosophical thought in the body of Paul’s address; (5) Paul’s citation of Greek poets; and (6) Paul’s appeal to the resurrection as proof. A correct interpretation of these issues will prove that the presuppositional criticism of evidentialism is unsubstantiated and that Paul’s Mars Hill address better fits a broad evidentialist apologetic than a presuppositional apologetic. | ||
| 601 | |a Interpretation | ||
| 650 | 4 | |a Mars Hill | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Apologetics | |
| 650 | 4 | |a EVIDENTIALISM | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Presuppositionalism | |
| 650 | 4 | |a Proof | |
| 773 | 0 | 8 | |i Enthalten in |t The Evangelical quarterly |d Leiden : Brill, 1929 |g 92(2021), 4, Seite 328-350 |h Online-Ressource |w (DE-627)357865650 |w (DE-600)2095318-5 |w (DE-576)273873946 |x 2772-5472 |7 nnns |
| 773 | 1 | 8 | |g volume:92 |g year:2021 |g number:4 |g pages:328-350 |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://brill.com/view/journals/evqu/92/4/article-p328_3.xml |x Verlag |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 856 | 4 | 0 | |u https://doi.org/10.1163/27725472-09204003 |x Resolving-System |z lizenzpflichtig |3 Volltext |
| 936 | u | w | |d 92 |j 2021 |e 4 |h 328-350 |
| 951 | |a AR | ||
| ELC | |a 1 | ||
| ITA | |a 1 |t 1 | ||
| LOK | |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 | ||
| LOK | |0 001 4122495989 | ||
| LOK | |0 003 DE-627 | ||
| LOK | |0 004 1800264151 | ||
| LOK | |0 005 20220426104657 | ||
| LOK | |0 008 220426||||||||||||||||ger||||||| | ||
| LOK | |0 040 |a DE-Tue135 |c DE-627 |d DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 092 |o n | ||
| LOK | |0 852 |a DE-Tue135 | ||
| LOK | |0 852 1 |9 00 | ||
| LOK | |0 935 |a ixzs |a ixzo | ||
| ORI | |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw | ||