On the Non-enforceability of the Penal Sanctions in the Mosaic Law
Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since t...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2022
|
| In: |
Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 16, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 90-107 |
| IxTheo Classification: | CH Christianity and Society NCA Ethics NCD Political ethics |
| Further subjects: | B
civil magistrate
B judicial law B penal sanctions B moral law B Reformed Theology B ceremonial law B Mosaic Law B Theonomy |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since they were enforced by magistrates who worked in conjunction with Levitical priests in the context of a now-defunct priesthood, today’s magistrates would lack the divine guidance and authority to enforce the judicial laws as was once prescribed. A conceptual distinction should therefore be drawn between moral/judicial laws and their legal enforcement in society. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 1569-7312 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1163/15697312-bja10026 |
