On the Non-enforceability of the Penal Sanctions in the Mosaic Law

Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since t...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of reformed theology
Main Author: Flowers, Michael V. (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Brill 2022
In: Journal of reformed theology
Year: 2022, Volume: 16, Issue: 1/2, Pages: 90-107
IxTheo Classification:CH Christianity and Society
NCA Ethics
NCD Political ethics
Further subjects:B civil magistrate
B judicial law
B penal sanctions
B moral law
B Reformed Theology
B ceremonial law
B Mosaic Law
B Theonomy
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:Although the “theonomy” debate has largely subsided, it continues to be espoused by a vocal minority because it was never properly addressed. The key issue is not whether the judicial laws are still binding. These laws are grounded in God’s moral character; hence, they are still binding. But since they were enforced by magistrates who worked in conjunction with Levitical priests in the context of a now-defunct priesthood, today’s magistrates would lack the divine guidance and authority to enforce the judicial laws as was once prescribed. A conceptual distinction should therefore be drawn between moral/judicial laws and their legal enforcement in society.
ISSN:1569-7312
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of reformed theology
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1163/15697312-bja10026