Which ‘That’ Was Amharic Yä‐? An Alternative Origin for the Amharic Relative‐Genitive Marker

This article re‐evaluates arguments regarding the previously proposed origin of the Amharic relative‐genitive marker yä‐. The traditional proposal relies on the attestation of a ž‐ form in Tigrinya (Praetorius 1874) and reconstructs a form *zä‐ (the same as the Ge′ez relative) for yä‐. However, no s...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zhang, Hongwei (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Oxford University Press 2021
In: Journal of Semitic studies
Year: 2021, Volume: 66, Issue: 2, Pages: 619-642
Online Access: Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)
Description
Summary:This article re‐evaluates arguments regarding the previously proposed origin of the Amharic relative‐genitive marker yä‐. The traditional proposal relies on the attestation of a ž‐ form in Tigrinya (Praetorius 1874) and reconstructs a form *zä‐ (the same as the Ge′ez relative) for yä‐. However, no such form is attested in Old Amharic writing (Girma Awgichew 2014), even though it has convenient orthographic conventions for recording palatalized consonants. Based on the attested levelling of l‐ forms of the relative marker in Ethiopian Semitic and Modern Arabic, I propose deriving the Amharic relative‐ genitive marker yä‐ from a levelled plural relative marker containing l, an element visible in the demonstrative paradigms of Ethiopian Semitic. This alternative derivation fits the synchronic Amharic phonology in which the lateral liquid l becomes the palatal glide y. In addition, it follows the cross‐linguistically common palatalization process similarly attested for l in the historical phonology of other languages, e.g. Berber, Romance and Chinese.
ISSN:1477-8556
Contains:Enthalten in: Journal of Semitic studies
Persistent identifiers:DOI: 10.1093/jss/fgab001