Lo stato del dibattito sulla personeità nella teologia ortodossa contemporanea

This paper aims at outlining the origins and development of the debate on the theology of personhood in contemporary Orthodoxy, starting from the Paris school that emerged in the 1930s and was nourished by the Russian diaspora up to the recent debate on Trinitarian ontology occasioned by the work of...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mainoldi, Ernesto Sergio 1970- (Author)
Format: Print Article
Language:Italian
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Lateran Univ. Press 2021
In: Lateranum
Year: 2021, Volume: 87, Issue: 2, Pages: 337-346
IxTheo Classification:KAJ Church history 1914-; recent history
KBK Europe (East)
KDF Orthodox Church
NBF Christology
Further subjects:B ontologia trinitaria
B trinitarian ontology
B Personalismo
B Personalism
B Zizioulas
B Yannaras

MARC

LEADER 00000caa a22000002 4500
001 1795831413
003 DE-627
005 20240508102423.0
007 tu
008 220317s2021 xx ||||| 00| ||ita c
035 |a (DE-627)1795831413 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1795831413 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a ita 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |e VerfasserIn  |0 (DE-588)1089835167  |0 (DE-627)853639876  |0 (DE-576)187221081  |4 aut  |a Mainoldi, Ernesto Sergio  |d 1970- 
109 |a Mainoldi, Ernesto Sergio 1970-  |a Mainoldi, Ernesto Sergio N. 1970-  |a Mainoldi, Ernesto 1970- 
245 1 3 |a Lo stato del dibattito sulla personeità nella teologia ortodossa contemporanea 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a ohne Hilfsmittel zu benutzen  |b n  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Band  |b nc  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a This paper aims at outlining the origins and development of the debate on the theology of personhood in contemporary Orthodoxy, starting from the Paris school that emerged in the 1930s and was nourished by the Russian diaspora up to the recent debate on Trinitarian ontology occasioned by the work of Metropolitan Ioannis Zizioulas. It can be noticed that the contemporary critical debate follows the same criteria of orthodoxy that have already emerged in the patristic and Byzantine eras. 
650 4 |a Personalism 
650 4 |a Personalismo 
650 4 |a Yannaras 
650 4 |a Zizioulas 
650 4 |a ontologia trinitaria 
650 4 |a trinitarian ontology 
652 |a KAJ:KBK:KDF:NBF 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Lateranum  |d Città del Vaticano : Lateran Univ. Press, 1922  |g 87(2021), 2, Seite 337-346  |w (DE-627)167115758  |w (DE-600)412014-0  |w (DE-576)015539768  |x 1010-7215  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:87  |g year:2021  |g number:2  |g pages:337-346 
951 |a AR 
ELC |b 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4093536171 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1795831413 
LOK |0 005 20220427110109 
LOK |0 008 220317||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a ixzo 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442048824  |a KBK 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442050373  |a KDF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442051787  |a NBF 
LOK |0 936ln  |0 1442044640  |a KAJ 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw