Why some defenders of positive duties serve a bad theoretical cocktail

In the literature on global justice, there has been a lengthy debate about what the world’s rich owe to the world’s poor. Some have argued that rich individuals have positive duties of beneficence to help the poor, while others have argued that rich individuals only have negative duties not to harm...

Full description

Saved in:  
Bibliographic Details
Authors: Sønderholm, Jørn (Author) ; Mainz, Jakob Thrane (Author)
Format: Electronic Article
Language:English
Check availability: HBZ Gateway
Journals Online & Print:
Drawer...
Fernleihe:Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste
Published: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group 2021
In: Journal of global ethics
Year: 2021, Volume: 17, Issue: 3, Pages: 323-339
Further subjects:B Peter Singer
B Positive duties
B Poverty
B Global Justice
B cut-off points
Online Access: Presumably Free Access
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig)

MARC

LEADER 00000naa a22000002 4500
001 1794332669
003 DE-627
005 20220302052539.0
007 cr uuu---uuuuu
008 220302s2021 xx |||||o 00| ||eng c
024 7 |a 10.1080/17449626.2021.1949377  |2 doi 
035 |a (DE-627)1794332669 
035 |a (DE-599)KXP1794332669 
040 |a DE-627  |b ger  |c DE-627  |e rda 
041 |a eng 
084 |a 1  |2 ssgn 
100 1 |a Sønderholm, Jørn  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
245 1 0 |a Why some defenders of positive duties serve a bad theoretical cocktail 
264 1 |c 2021 
336 |a Text  |b txt  |2 rdacontent 
337 |a Computermedien  |b c  |2 rdamedia 
338 |a Online-Ressource  |b cr  |2 rdacarrier 
520 |a In the literature on global justice, there has been a lengthy debate about what the world’s rich owe to the world’s poor. Some have argued that rich individuals have positive duties of beneficence to help the poor, while others have argued that rich individuals only have negative duties not to harm them. A common objection to the former view is that once it is accepted that positive duties exist, fulfilling these duties will be overdemanding since rich individuals can almost always help a little more. Some have tried to overcome this overdemandingness objection by setting cut-off points for how demanding morality is. In this article, we aim to show that it is problematic to be committed to the following propositions: (1) Positive duties to aid exist; (2) The overdemandingness objection is a serious challenge for anyone who accepts that positive duties to aid exist; and (3) Setting cut-off points for how demanding morality is constitutes a plausible way to overcome the overdemandingness objection. Showing that a commitment to (1), (2) and (3) is problematic is of interest given that several influential theorists are committed to this set of views. This set of views is simply a bad theoretical cocktail. 
650 4 |a Peter Singer 
650 4 |a cut-off points 
650 4 |a Positive duties 
650 4 |a Poverty 
650 4 |a Global Justice 
700 1 |a Mainz, Jakob Thrane  |e VerfasserIn  |4 aut 
773 0 8 |i Enthalten in  |t Journal of global ethics  |d London : Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, 2005  |g 17(2021), 3, Seite 323-339  |h Online-Ressource  |w (DE-627)506719197  |w (DE-600)2219472-1  |w (DE-576)378913263  |x 1744-9634  |7 nnns 
773 1 8 |g volume:17  |g year:2021  |g number:3  |g pages:323-339 
856 |u https://philpapers.org/archive/SNDWSD.pdf  |x unpaywall  |z Vermutlich kostenfreier Zugang  |h repository [oa repository (via OAI-PMH title and first author match)] 
856 4 0 |u https://doi.org/10.1080/17449626.2021.1949377  |x Resolving-System  |z lizenzpflichtig  |3 Volltext 
935 |a mteo 
951 |a AR 
ELC |a 1 
ITA |a 1  |t 1 
LOK |0 000 xxxxxcx a22 zn 4500 
LOK |0 001 4076713532 
LOK |0 003 DE-627 
LOK |0 004 1794332669 
LOK |0 005 20220302052539 
LOK |0 008 220302||||||||||||||||ger||||||| 
LOK |0 035   |a (DE-Tue135)IxTheo#2022-03-01#C615E7AE99135E5BDE66A460CC7DD631E77E3AD1 
LOK |0 040   |a DE-Tue135  |c DE-627  |d DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 092   |o n 
LOK |0 852   |a DE-Tue135 
LOK |0 852 1  |9 00 
LOK |0 935   |a ixzs  |a zota 
OAS |a 1 
ORI |a SA-MARC-ixtheoa001.raw