Same Sound, Better Reading?: Text-Critical Analysis of the 1 Cor 15,49 Variants
A recent trend in scholarship on 1 Corinthians presents the verb φορέσωμεν (taken as an aorist hortatory subjunctive) as the earliest recoverable reading, as opposed to the reading of φορέσομεν (taken as a future indicative). These scholars have appealed to the merits of the ω spelling in satisfying...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | English |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Journals Online & Print: | Drawer...
|
| Interlibrary Loan: | Interlibrary Loan for the Fachinformationsdienste (Specialized Information Services in Germany) |
| Published: |
2021
|
| In: |
Biblica
Year: 2021, Volume: 102, Issue: 3, Pages: 419-434 |
| Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Letters
/ Bible. Corinthians 1. 15,49
/ Paul Apostle
/ Greek language
/ Textual criticism
|
| IxTheo Classification: | HA Bible HC New Testament |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Summary: | A recent trend in scholarship on 1 Corinthians presents the verb φορέσωμεν (taken as an aorist hortatory subjunctive) as the earliest recoverable reading, as opposed to the reading of φορέσομεν (taken as a future indicative). These scholars have appealed to the merits of the ω spelling in satisfying certain text-critical criteria. However, I argue that their applications of these criteria are flawed. Furthermore, I illustrate how scholars who argue for this reading fail to account for all the possibilities of why the ω spelling is present and thus fail to demonstrate adequately that this reading best explains all variants. |
|---|---|
| ISSN: | 2385-2062 |
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Biblica
|
| Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2143/BIB.102.3.3289783 |