Thought-suppression in the Pātañjalayogaśāstra: against Ian Whicher’s interpretation of Patañjali’s yoga
The Pātañjalayogaśāstra (PYŚ) is typically understood to define yoga as thought-suppression. In several publications, Ian Whicher has sought to avoid the conclusion that the PYŚ endorses thought-suppression by proposing that the PYŚ’s definition of yoga refers not to thought-suppression but to liber...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
Carfax
2022
|
In: |
Asian philosophy
Year: 2022, Volume: 32, Issue: 1, Pages: 19-32 |
Standardized Subjects / Keyword chains: | B
Whicher, Ian 1954-
/ Patañjali, Philosopher, Yogasūtra
/ Vyāsa, Yogabhāṣya
/ Thinking
/ Dissolution
|
IxTheo Classification: | AB Philosophy of religion; criticism of religion; atheism BK Hinduism, Jainism, Sikhism KBM Asia |
Further subjects: | B
sūtra
B Patañjali B Yogabhāṣya B Yoga B Yogasūtra |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The Pātañjalayogaśāstra (PYŚ) is typically understood to define yoga as thought-suppression. In several publications, Ian Whicher has sought to avoid the conclusion that the PYŚ endorses thought-suppression by proposing that the PYŚ’s definition of yoga refers not to thought-suppression but to liberation from the puruṣa’s misidentification with the mind. I argue that Whicher’s proposal is unsuccessful because the PYŚ portrays thought-suppression as necessary for this liberation. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1469-2961 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Asian philosophy
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.1080/09552367.2021.1983961 |