At the Margins of the Rule of Faith: Reflections on the Reception History of Problematic Texts and Themes
The rule of faith is often celebrated for its apparent effect of uniting Christian theology and exegesis even amidst the obvious divisions that divide Christians and churches. This essay attempts to describe how similarly common commitments and practices may be discerned in the commentaries of Prote...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Electronic Article |
Language: | English |
Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
Journals Online & Print: | |
Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
Published: |
The Pennsylvania State University Press
2013
|
In: |
Journal of theological interpretation
Year: 2013, Volume: 7, Issue: 2, Pages: 187-198 |
Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
Summary: | The rule of faith is often celebrated for its apparent effect of uniting Christian theology and exegesis even amidst the obvious divisions that divide Christians and churches. This essay attempts to describe how similarly common commitments and practices may be discerned in the commentaries of Protestant reformers. Special attention is paid, however, to some potential limitations of the rule of faith as well as to the kind of dialogue that may emerge when reception history draws on a truly wide sample of traditional exegesis in order to establish both family resemblances and family disagreements. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 2576-7933 |
Contains: | Enthalten in: Journal of theological interpretation
|
Persistent identifiers: | DOI: 10.2307/26421565 |