Kommentar zu Kathrin Koslickis "Form, Matter, Substance"
According to Kathrin Koslickí’s Form — Matter — Substance, substances are complex unities composed of matter and form aspects. Both matter and form are entities which, as proper parts, comprise the unity of substances. In my commentary I aim to criticize this version of »mereological« hylomorphism :...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Contributors: | |
| Format: | Electronic Article |
| Language: | German |
| Check availability: | HBZ Gateway |
| Fernleihe: | Fernleihe für die Fachinformationsdienste |
| Published: |
Echter
2020
|
| In: |
Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
Year: 2020, Volume: 142, Issue: 2, Pages: 232-238 |
| Online Access: |
Volltext (lizenzpflichtig) |
| Parallel Edition: | Non-electronic
|
| Summary: | According to Kathrin Koslickí’s Form — Matter — Substance, substances are complex unities composed of matter and form aspects. Both matter and form are entities which, as proper parts, comprise the unity of substances. In my commentary I aim to criticize this version of »mereological« hylomorphism : It denies classical independence-criteria for substancehood and assumes a problematic unity-criterion. It is furthermore committed to a questionable »bottom-up« understanding of reality. |
|---|---|
| Contains: | Enthalten in: Zeitschrift für katholische Theologie
|